The anti-nomadic bias of political theory

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-8110-6514
dc.contributor.authorRingmar, Erik Ivar
dc.contributor.otherİnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T13:58:34Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T13:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİHÜ, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü
dc.description.abstractOver the last couple of decades, the conditions of life for nomadic peoples have been radically rethought (Devore & Lee, 1999). Contrary to what we once were told, the lives of hunters, gatherers and pastoralists are generally not “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short” (Hobbes, 1651, i:13, p. 84). Rather, barring environmental calamities, their lives are sociable, rich, pleasant, sophisticated and long. Gatherers are not desperately digging for roots and hunters are not chasing wild geese. Instead hunters and gatherers have traditionally lived in abundant environments where looking for food is similar to looking for something to eat in a refrigerator (Turnbull, 1984, pp. 96–108). Their days can be spent on leisurely activities, and when food is required, they simply go and get it...
dc.identifier.citationRingmar, E. (2020). The anti-nomadic bias of political theory. J. Levin (Ed.), Nomad-State Relationships in International Relations içinde (45-61. ss.). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-28053-6
dc.identifier.endpage61
dc.identifier.isbn9783030280529
dc.identifier.isbn9783030280536
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088469138
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/A
dc.identifier.startpage45
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28053-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12154/1211
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorRingmar, Erik Ivar
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0002-8110-6514
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan
dc.relation.ihupublicationcategory124
dc.relation.ispartofNomad-State Relationships in International Relations
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararası
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPolitical Theory
dc.subjectAnti-Nomadic Bias
dc.subjectInternational Relations
dc.subjectPolitical Animals
dc.titleThe anti-nomadic bias of political theory
dc.typeBook Chapter
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione45016a9-4104-4388-b08b-3fd8871e914a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye45016a9-4104-4388-b08b-3fd8871e914a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication72059188-0294-41e8-a8e5-b68d1c540523
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery72059188-0294-41e8-a8e5-b68d1c540523

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
E.Ringmar1.pdf
Boyut:
305.2 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ N/A ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.52 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu