Yeşilırmak, Ali
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk Bölümü
İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi, hukuk ve adalet bilincinin toplumda yaygınlaşmasına hizmet edebilecek, ulusal ve uluslararası hukuk alanında yaşanan gelişmeleri yorumlayıp değerlendirebilecek, fikrî bağımsızlığa sahip, çokdilli, küresel rekabet ortamında başarı sağlayabilecek ve Türkiye'yi uluslararası alanda temsil edebilecek hukukçular yetiştirmeyi hedeflemektedir.
Adı Soyadı
Ali Yeşilırmak
İlgi Alanları
International Commercial Law, Arbitration, International Investment Law, Litigation
Kurumdaki Durumu
Aktif Personel
4 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
Yayın Transparency and stakeholders’ role in the selection of the arbitral tribunal(Wolters Kluwer, 2023) Yeşilırmak, Ali; Yeşilırmak, Ali; Brekoulakis, Stavros; Weeramantry, Romesh; Nagapetyan, Lilit; Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk BölümüInternational arbitration has been ever evolving since the introduction of modernized arbitration rules in the last century.1 The evolution is very mııch related to the satisfaction of users and other stakeholders of arbitration. One of the evolving areas is transparency. The issue of transparency mainly derived from investment arbitration2 for the protection of public interests, but has been adopted to cover wider interests, needs and dynamics in international commercial arbitration. Transparency touches upon many aspects of international commercial arbitration; selection/appointment of arbitrators, the arbitration process, orders and awards ete. Perhaps one of the most important of ali is the selection/appointment of arbitrators. This is because ‘arbitration is only as good as its arbitrators.’3 The selection/appointment of arbitrators generally has a direct effect on the quality of arbitration. The users of arbitration desires to have predietable and just decisionmaking. Thus, transparency is directly related to independence and impartiality of arbitrators, due process and accountability…Yayın Practical insights on interim and conservatory measures(Wolters Kluwer, 2021) Yeşilırmak, Ali; Gültutan, DoğanInterim or conservatory measures are forms of remedy or relief aimed at protecting and preserving the rights of a party pending the final resolution of a dispute. That is, they are necessarily temporary in character, although depending on the circumstances they may have a decisive effect on certain issues in a case or on the claimant’s ability to prosecute its claim. In international arbitration, interim or conservatory measures are also synonymously referred to as provisional and protective measures, preliminary measures, preliminary injunctive measures, urgent measures, precautionary measures, or holding measures...Yayın Interim measures and enforcement(Young-OGEMID, 2021) Yeşilırmak, Ali; Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk Bölümü; Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk BölümüInterim or conservatory measures are forms of remedy or relief aimed at protecting and preserving the rights of a party pending the final resolution of a dispute. They are temporary in nature and in certain circumstances may have a decisive effect on certain issues in a case or on the claimant’s ability to prosecute its claim Interim or conservatory measures in international arbitrations may be granted by arbitral tribunals, by emergency arbitrators (where the applicable rules permit) and by competent national courts. The appropriate forum in respect of interim or conservatory measures will depend on the applicable laws and arbitration rules. Where two or more avenues are seemingly open for the applicant, the most effective and advantageous avenue will need to be identified. However, parties should beware of any rules and/or judicial (or arbitral) attitudes forbidding a second “bite at the cherry” in case the first avenue fails to produce the desired outcome. The types of interim or conservatory measures that an arbitral tribunal, emergency arbitrator and/or a national court judge, as applicable, may grant differ depending on the applicable laws and arbitration rules, but they generally include: - preservation of the status quo until the tribunal’s final decision on the merits, such as an order restricting financial or other transfers outside the ordinary course of business that are made principally to evade enforcement efforts; - preservation of property or evidence; payment of deposits or advances on arbitration costs; interim orders requiring performance of obligations; - orders prohibiting aggravation of the parties’ dispute; and - security for costs. Interim or conservatory measures may be issued in the form of orders, decisions, awards (interim or partial) or recommendations. The form granted may differ on a case-by-case basis, and also depending on the applicable arbitration rules and/or laws. Important consideration when seeking interim measures may include: - Whether an interim or conservatory measure from the arbitral tribunal will assist in realising the desired aim or outcome. - Whether, under the applicable laws and arbitration rules, the arbitral tribunal possesses the power to and can effectively grant the required interim or conservatory measure required in the circumstances of the case. - Whether any interim or conservatory measure granted by the arbitral tribunal will be voluntarily complied with by the counter-party. If not, a national court's assistance may be required in respect of enforcing the tribunal-issued measure. There are substantial divergences between various jurisdictions as regards the legal test that must be satisfied for a national court to intervene and assist with the enforcement of a tribunal-issued measure, as well as in respect of the types of measures available. The same divergence exists where interim or conservatory measures are alternatively (or additionally, where permitted) sought directly from a national court(s). An unenforceable order or award from the arbitral tribunal is near-worthless, so parties must consider the enforceability of any interim or conservatory measures before applying for them. The same is true of interim or conservatory measures ordered by a court that are incapable of enforcement for some reason, e.g., absence of any debtor assets in the jurisdiction. The time and costs consequences of any enforcement proceedings should be considered as part of the financial implications of applying for an interim or conservatory measure, and considered by parties prior to making an application.Yayın Evaluation of UAE’ new law on arbitration on interim measures of protection(International Chamber of Commerce, 2019) Yeşilırmak, Ali; Yeşilırmak, Ali; Hukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk BölümüBu toplantıda Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri’nin 2018 tarihli Tahkim Kanununda yer alan geçici hukuki koruma tedbirlerine ilişkin hükümler uluslararası hukuk açısından incelenmiştir. Hükümler, geçici hukuki koruma tedbirlerini iki açıdan incelemektedir. Bunlardan ilki hakeme verilen yetkilerdir. Kanun hakeme geçici hukuki koruma tedbirleri konusunda son derece geniş yetkiler vermiştir. Hakem her türlü geçici hukuki koruma tedbirini taraflardan talep olsun veya olmasın alabilir. Bu tedbirlerin alınmasını bir teminat verilmesine bağlayabilir. Hakemlerin verdiği geçici hukuki koruma kararları icra edilebilir. Ancak geçici hukuki koruma kararları nihai hakem kararı olarak verilememektedir. Yine acil durum hakemine ilişkin açık bir düzenleme kanunda yer almamaktadır. Ayrıca Kanuna göre mahkemeler de geçici hukuki koruma kararları verebilmektedir. Özellikle tahkime taraf olmayan üçüncü kişilere karşı veya derhal icrası gereken kararlar için de mahkemeye başvurmak gerekecektir. Mahkeme ve hakemlerin birlikte yetkisi düzenlenirken ikisi arasında bir öncelik güdülmemiştir. Aslında hakemin yetkilerine öncelik verilmesi düşünülebilirdi.
