Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü
Tarih Bölümü, çok-yönlü, disiplinler-arası, mukayeseli ve sosyolojik bir zenginlik üretmeyi; bu suretle, gerek Avrupa-merkezci veya Batı-merkezci, gerekse dar Osmanlı-Türk odaklı yaklaşımları aşmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Adı Soyadı
Suraija Roschan Faroqhi
İlgi Alanları
Osmanlı Tarihi, Sosyal Tarih, Kentsel Üretim ve Tüketim
Kurumdaki Durumu
Aktif Personel
23 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 10 / 23
Yayın Introduction(SAGE, 2019) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüVery often, the editors responsible for collections of articles will statethat they have joined originally disparate contributions into coherentpublications that resemble single-author books. Put differently, theseeditors claim to have established strong connections between the piecesentrusted to them by individual authors. Often these editors will go so faras to rename the articles at issue, now calling them ‘chapters’. By contrast,the present collection is consciously eclectic, and the editor does not aimat presenting the eight articles appearing here as parts of a unified whole.Rather, I hope that readers will be able to visualise, at least in part, thediversity of approaches to pre-1850s Ottoman social history as practicedtoday. Moreover, this collection should make visible some trends thatmay be relevant for the future, the historians at issue—with the exceptionof the present author—being either young scholars or else in mid-career.Yayın Anadolu'da bektaşilik : XV yüzyıl sonlarından 1826 yılına kadar(Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım, 2017) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüBu çalışma büyük ölçüde, saygıdeğer hocam Prof. Ömer Lütfi Barkan'm (İstanbul) beni yönlendirmiş olduğu arşiv belgelerine dayanmaktadır. Aynı şekilde Prof. Halil İnalcık (Chicago) ve Prof. Nejat Göyünç (İstanbul) de değerli katkılarda bulundular. Dr. Abdülbaki Gölpmarlı'nm yardımseverliği sayesinde şahsına ait bir el yazmasını inceleme ve kendisinin tasavvuf hakkındaki engin ve derin bilgisinden faydalanma fırsatı buldum. Her birine içten teşekkürlerimi sunmak isterim. Prof. Andreas Tietze (Viyana), Prof, irene Melikoff (Strazburg) ve Prof. Subhi Labib (Kiel), henüz oluşma aşamasındayken bu kitabın farklı bölümlerini okuma inceliğini gösterdiler. Elbette ki yapılmış olabilecek tüm hatalardan sadece yazarın kendisi sorumludurYayın Early-modern commodity routes: Ottoman silks in the webs of world trade(Oxford University Press, 2023) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüSilk was particularly important to intra-empire/inter-regional commerce across the vast Ottoman empire, in addition to trade with bordering polities. Historians have approached the interrelated issues of import substitution, political control of trade, trade linked to manufacture, and consumption through Braudel and Wallerstein’s concepts of ‘world economy’ and ‘world-empire’—in which significant sections of the late-eighteenth- and nineteenth-century-Ottoman Empire were incorporated as peripheral territories into a world economy dominated by Europe. Yet, this approach has been little used for the early-modern period, when Ottoman manufacturers supplied luxury silks to Poland, Russia, and the principalities forming present-day Romania, while artisans from the island of Chios successfully substituted their own silks for costly imports from Venice, Iran, and India. Well into the eighteenth century, Ottoman strength derived from control of overland trade routes, more secure than the pirate-infested Indian and Atlantic Oceans—and the war-torn Mediterranean.Yayın Istanbul and Crete in the mid-1600s: Evliya Çelebi’s discourse on non-Muslims(SAGE, 2019) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüThe subject of our discussion is the travelogue of Evliya Çelebi, born in 1611to a goldsmith of the sultans’ palace known as Derviş Mehemmed Zılli andwho probably died in Cairo around 1685. It is intriguing for a multitudeof reasons, one of them especially relevant for the present purpose: WhileEvliya’s work covers the entire Ottoman Empire and adjacent territories inten substantial volumes, we do not know the patrons and/or other addresseesthat the author may have envisaged. While the author often mentioned twogrand viziers and other figures of the highest levels of the Ottoman elite,who employed him and with whom he had good relations, by the mid-1680sthey had mostly predeceased him, sometimes by several decades.Yayın Suraiya Faroqhi: 15-16 yaşından beri tarihçi olmak istiyordum(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, 2017) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümüİbn Haldun Üniversitesi’nin Tarih Bölümü kadrosuna katılan dünyaca saygın Tarih Profesörü Suraiya Faroqhi’ye Açık Medeniyet Gazetesi olarak hem hoş geldiniz dedik hem de kendisiyle bu keyifli röportajı gerçekleştirdik. Suraiya Faroqhi, Alman bir anne ve Hint Müslümanı bir hekim babanın çocuğu olarak 1941’de Almanya’nın Berlin şehrinde doğdu. Hamburg Üniversitesi’nde okurken öğrenci değişim programı çerçevesinde İstanbul Üniversitesi’ne devam etti. 1962 yılında İstanbul’a gelen Faroqhi, burada Ömer Lütfi Barkan’ın öğrencisi oldu, yüksek lisans tezini Hamburg’da tamamladı. 1968-1970 yılları arasında Bloomington Üniversitesi’nde İngilizce dil eğitimi aldı. Tez çalışmasını tamamladıktan sonra 1971 yılında Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi’nde İngilizce öğretmenliği yapmaya başladı. İktisadi ve sosyal tarih üzerine çalışan Faroqhi, 1980 yılında biri Almanya’da, diğeri Türkiye’de olmak üzere iki doçentlik tezi hazırladı. 1986 yılında profesör oldu. 1987 yılında emekli olan Suraiya Faroqhi, Münih Ludwig Maximillan Üniversitesi’ne gitti. Buradan da 2005 yılında emekli olan Faroqhi, tekrar İstanbul’a döndü ve Bilgi Üniversitesi’nde dersler vermeye başladı ve Emeritus unvanı aldı. 2017 yılında İbn Haldun Üniversitesi’nin tarih bölümü kadrosuna geçti.Yayın Aziz Nesin about himself and his parents: Poor people in Istanbul during the late Ottoman period(Cambridge University Press, 2021) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüA resolute modernist and socialist, Aziz Nesin (1915–95) was definitely an author of the republican period. Born Mehmet Nusret to poor parents, both migrants to Istanbul from the Black Sea coast, he adopted Nesin as his legal surname when surnames became obligatory in 1934. By the 1950s, his satirical short stories and plays had made him famous, but he faced political difficulties for much of his life; likely, it did not endear him to the authorities that he used his experiences with the police as inexhaustible material for his stories. In 1966, when in his early fifties, Aziz Nesin published Böyle Gelmiş Böyle Gitmez: Otobiyografi (That is the Way He has Come, But That is Not the Way He is Leaving: An Autobiography), the first volume of what was to become a three-volume series, which he called an autobiography.1 The first volume, which is the subject of this study, has remained the most popular; it focuses on Nesin’s childhood in Istanbul during the late 1910s and throughout the 1920s, with biographies of both his father and his mother embedded in the story.2 Nesin had begun the necessary research in the 1950s, including a trip to the Black Sea village where his mother had been born. He searched for documents as well, seemingly with limited success...Yayın An Ottoman gentleman observing İzmir at a time of change: Evliya Çelebi on the Road, 1670-1(İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2022) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; Gökçe, Turan; Çalış, Hüseyin; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüIzmir was the ‘mushroom city’ of the seventeenth-century Ottoman world: while a small town in the late 1500s, by the end of the seventeenth century, the city may have been home to nearly 90,000 people. If realistic, this figure would mean that by the late 1600s, Izmir probably surpassed Bursa and belonged to the major cities of the empire. This increase is even more remarkable as the Ottoman central authorities certainly did not promote migration into the cities: on the other hand, before the mid-twentieth century newcomers from the countryside probably were a condition sine qua non for rapid urban growth. Ever since the 1990s, historians have tried to identify the reasons for Izmir’s dramatic expansion.Yayın On the spot Surma Farm(Kirsten Price, 2023) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüWe ask leading historians why their research matters, what history has taught them, and what we should be reading…Yayın The material world of early modern Ottoman women: Ornaments, robes and domestic furnishings in Istanbul and Bursa(Brill, 2021) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüThe present article investigates the jewelry and domestic furnishings owned by wealthy women who died in Bursa during the early 1730s, combining the data derived from the estate inventories of the decedents with imagery, both Ottoman and non-Ottoman, dating to the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. This tentative linkage between the written and the visual has made it possible to 'zoom in' on the manner in which well-to-do females of eighteenth-century Bursa decorated their homes, and speculate about the considerations that induced them to use the most valuable textiles largely for home furnishings as opposed to garments.Yayın Making things to serve sultans, viziers and army commanders (1450-1800)(SAGE, 2018) Faroqhi, Suraija Roschan; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Tarih BölümüOttoman documents on manufactures for court and army concentrate on governmental initiatives. However, the time has come to view these branches of production in a broader, comparative perspective, focusing on the demands of the sultan’s officials and the actions of skilled persons working for the apparatus of empire. As for the production of military hardware, the demands of eighteenthcentury warfare fell most heavily on the more prosperous workshops; and the lack of working capital became a permanent worry after the Russo- Ottoman war of 1768–74. However, until about 1750, the sultans’ military machine was still ahead of the Russians in the supply of armaments and foodstuffs. Technology and the lack of manufacturing skills, thus, were not at issue when Ottoman armies suffered defeat.
