Toprak, Taha Burak

Profil fotoğrafı
 E-posta Adresi
taha.toprak@ihu.edu.tr
ORCID Profili
0000-0001-7958-4181
WoS Profili
JXY-8979-2024
Scopus Profili
58879273100
TR-Dizin Profili
756409
SOBİAD Profili
365383
Web Sitesi
akademik.ihu.edu.tr/tr/taha-toprak

Araştırma projeleri

Organizasyon Birimleri

Organizasyon Birimi Logosu
Organizasyon Birimi
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
Psikoloji Bölümü BSc, MA, MSc ve PhD dereceleri sunmaktadır ve bu çalışma alanları gelişmektedir. Psikoloji biliminin ele aldığı konular, beynin işlevlerinden toplumsal hareketlerin incelenmesine, çocuk gelişiminden ruhsal bozuklukların nasıl tedavi edilebileceğine kadar uzanan çok geniş bir yelpazede yer alır. Bu zenginlik, psikolojinin birçok farklı, ancak birbiriyle etkileşim içinde olan alt alanlarının bulunduğu anlamına gelmektedir.

Adı Soyadı

Taha Burak Toprak

İlgi Alanları

Kurumdaki Durumu

Aktif Personel

Filtreler

20241
Filtreleri Sıfırla

Ayarlar

İndeks: Scopus × WoS Q: Q2 ×

Arama Sonuçları

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
  • Küçük Resim
    Yayın
    Psychotherapies for the treatment of scrupulosity: A systematic review
    (Springer, 2024) Toprak, Taha Burak; Özçelik, Hanne Nur; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümü
    “Scrupulosity” is a common but understudied subtype of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) characterized by religious obsessions and compulsions. Although scrupulosity is a common manifestation of OCD, it has not been adequately addressed in treatment studies. The aim of this study was to understand the conceptual nuances of scrupulosity, its diagnosis, the unique differences in conceptualization and interventions during its treatment, the specific tools needed to monitor the prognosis of the pathology, and the limitations of existing studies through a systematic review. Following PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted, and 13 relevant studies were found in Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, EbscoHost+Ulakbim, Wiley Online Library, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, and Web of Science databases. Two researchers independently rated the included articles using the MMAT and then met to compare the ratings. Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus was reached. There was a general lack of clarity in the conceptualization, diagnosis, and measurement of the severity of scrupulosity, and the content of religious or cultural interventions in the studies was not always clear. For future studies, further clarification, and systematization of the phenomenological features of scrupulosity and related epidemiological and empirical/experimental treatment research are needed.