Doko, Enis
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
Bölüm, uluslararası standartlarda nitelikli bilgi üretmeyi, özellikle İslam felsefesi, Türk düşüncesi ve fenomenoloji geleneğini merkeze almayı ve bu meyanda felsefi bilgi üretilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Batı'da gelişen felsefenin soy kütüğünde sadece Yunan, Helenistik ve Hıristiyan değil, İslam felsefi mirası da yer almaktadır.
Adı Soyadı
Enis Doko
İlgi Alanları
Din Felsefesi, Bilim Felsefesi, Fizik Felsefesi, Soğuk Atom Fiziği
Kurumdaki Durumu
Aktif Personel
2 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Yayın Criticism of the non-theistic explanations of fine-tuning(Science Publishing Group, 2019) Doko, Enis; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe BölümüModern physics has shown that the universe is fine-tuned for life. Theists have argued that fine-tuning of the universe for life can be used as a premise in for a teleological argument for the existence of God. One possible way to develop such an argument is to argue that best explanation of fine-tuning is theistic design hypothesis. There are two strategies which can be employed against this argument. First one can claim that there are naturalistic explanations of fine-tuning superior than the design hypothesis. In this paper we analyze the two main alternatives of design hypothesis, the more fundamental law and multiverse hypothesis. Second one can object to the claim that design hypothesis can explain fine-tuning. We also analyze two such objections the “God of the gaps” objection and “Who designed the God” objection. We try to show that both approaches do not undermine the teleological argument based on fine-tuning.Yayın Does fine-tuning need an explanation?(2019) Doko, Enis; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe BölümüContemporary physics has shown that the universe is fine-tuned for life i.e. of all the possible ways physical laws, initial conditions and constants of physics could have been configured, only an extremely small range is capable of supporting life. Some theists have argued that fine-tuning can be used as a premise in a design argument for the existence of God, while some other scientists and philosophers have argued that fine-tuning provides evidence for a multiverse, a hypothesis which claim that there is more than one universe. Both approaches assume that fine-tuning needs some kind of an explanation. Despite the initial appeal some philosophers and scientists have denied the need of an explanation for the fine-tuning. They either deny that the universe is fine-tuned for existence or else think that we should not be surprised that universe is fine-tuned, and therefore should not search for an explanation. In this paper we analyse some of these claims and try to show that neither of them succeeds in demonstrating that fine-tuning does not need an explanation.
