Doko, Enis

Yükleniyor...
Profil fotoğrafı
E-posta Adresi ORCID Profili WoS Profili Scopus Profili YÖK Araştırmacı Profili Google Akademik Profili Web Sitesi

Araştırma projeleri

Organizasyon Birimleri

Organizasyon Birimi
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
Bölüm, uluslararası standartlarda nitelikli bilgi üretmeyi, özellikle İslam felsefesi, Türk düşüncesi ve fenomenoloji geleneğini merkeze almayı ve bu meyanda felsefi bilgi üretilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Batı'da gelişen felsefenin soy kütüğünde sadece Yunan, Helenistik ve Hıristiyan değil, İslam felsefi mirası da yer almaktadır.

Adı Soyadı

Enis Doko

İlgi Alanları

Din Felsefesi, Bilim Felsefesi, Fizik Felsefesi, Soğuk Atom Fiziği

Kurumdaki Durumu

Aktif Personel

Arama Sonuçları

Listeleniyor 1 - 4 / 4
  • Yayın
    A metaphysical inquiry into Islamic theism
    (Routledge, 2023) Doko, Enis; Turner, Jamie B.; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
    The effervescent and dynamic history of Islamic theology in its formative years bears witness to organic, philosophical, intra-religious, and politically charged developments over the question of God’s nature. Following the sudden and explosive expansion of Islamic civilization in the first 200 years since its advent, Muslims quickly developed a religious and political unity which saw them govern over large sways of disparate religious communities, with Muslims being a technical religious minority political ruling class. This rather distinct socio-political context in which Muslims found themselves gave rise to a whole host of developments in both religious and secular disciplines. To be sure, the religious diversity within the Umayyad and Abbasid empires did not impose or necessarily act as the primary influence upon these developments, but it and the combination of organic dialogue from within, followed by a touch here and there of politico-religious dogmatism (i.e., the mi?na of the Mu’tazila), led to a theological conversation which oversaw the flowering of distinct Islamic theological schools, and the advent of Muslim peripatetic philosophies...
  • Yayın
    Din açısından dünya dışı yaşama bakış
    (Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları, 2021) Doko, Enis; Fettahoğlu, Selen; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
    İnsanlık, tarih boyunca göğe bakıp Dünya dışı başka yaşam formlarının varlığı hakkında düşünceler üretmiştir. Farklı dünyalar ve olası yaşamlar üzerine düşünceler Antik Yunanlılara kadar dayanmaktadır. Örneğin, her ne kadar antik düşüncelerden bahsederken çoğumuzun aklına Aristo ve Platon’un Dünya merkezli evreni gelse de aynı çağda yaşamış olan Atomcular, diğer gezegenlerde yaşam formları olma ihtimalini içeren fikirler savunuyorlardı...
  • Yayın
    Islamic religious epistemology
    (Cambridge University Press, 2023) Turner, Jamie B.; Doko, Enis; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü
    This chapter aims to lay out a map of the diverse epistemological perspectiveswithin the Islamic theological tradition, in the conceptual framework of con-temporary analytic philosophy of religion. In order achieve that goal, it aims toconsider epistemological views in light of their historic context, while at thesame time seeking to “translate” those broadly medieval perspectives intocontemporary philosophical language. In doing so, the chapter offers a succinctoverview of the main epistemic trends within the Islamic theological traditionconcerning religious epistemology. The chapter is divided into two main sectionsdesignated for discussions of differing accounts found in distinct trends of thetradition, namely the Rationalist and Traditionalist trends. The discussion con-cerning the Rationalist trend focuses on the philosophical-theologians of thedominant Mu’tazilite, Ash’arite, and Maturidite schools. The section on IslamicTraditionalism focuses on the Atharite scripturalism of Ibn Qud?ma, and inparticular the thought of Ibn Taymiyya. In order to map out these historicpositions in light of contemporary religious epistemology, reference is made toa threefold typology of current views in the literature: (1) theistic evidentialism,(2) reformed epistemology, and (3) fideism.1 As such, the remainder of thechapter will attempt to outline the different approaches toward religious episte-mology in the Islamic theological tradition with this threefold typology in mind.
  • Yayın
    Where does morality come from? How can psychology help answer the question: Is morality innate?
    (İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, 2022) Gaaloul, Nadia; Doko, Enis; Doko, Enis
    In this research, I attempt to do two things. I will first answer whether morality is innate or acquired through philosophy and psychology. Second, I will uncover which philosophical, ethical theory is the most realistically accurate. Aristotle maintains that morality comes from a virtuous character that can be attained through practical wisdom and habituation. He believes that morality is acquired. Kant claims that morality is derived from categorical imperatives that are based on reason. He has the view that we cannot trust our innate impulses because they will lead us to radical evil. Mill also believes that morality comes from reason, yet he sees that this reason is based on the principle of utility, which judges a moral action based on the amount of pleasure and goodness it produces. Regarding Psychologists, there are two arguments. Thinkers that believe that morality is acquired argue that it is culturally conditioned and, like Kant and Mill, believe that we cannot trust our innate feelings and instincts as they will lead us astray. Part of those innate feelings is empathy, which cannot be trusted to guide our morality. Those that believe morality is innate see that it is a product of evolution and that it is partially innate, that we have innate mechanisms, that include empathy, that motivate us to act morally and learn moral laws and rules from our culture. Even though morality is partially innate, we are still responsible for creating moral habits since our cognitive structures are limited and will cause us mental fatigue if we have to think about and attend to every moral cue. Most empirical findings point to Aristotle's theory being the closest. He was right in what he claimed, except for the idea that morality is fully acquired.