Duran, Burhanettin
Yükleniyor...
Araştırma projeleri
Organizasyon Birimleri
Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Ana Bilim Dalı
İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler yüksek lisans programı disiplinin ilgilendiği konular itibarıyla günümüzde ihtiyaç duyduğumuz uzmanları ve araştırmacıları yetiştirmeyi hedefler. Uluslararası sistemde meydana gelen çatışmalar, savaşlar, insani krizler ve daha özelde ise Türkiye’nin gerek içerideki güvenlik sorunları gerekse de çevre coğrafyamızda yaşanan savaşlar, siyasi istikrarsızlıklar ve göç gibi problemleri nedeniyle iyi yetişmiş Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler uzmanlarına ihtiyacı vardır.
Adı Soyadı
Burhanettin Duran
İlgi Alanları
Türk Dış Politikası, Türk İç Politikası, İslamcılık, Türk Siyasal Düşüncesi, Ortadoğu Siyaseti
Kurumdaki Durumu
Pasif Personel
3 sonuçlar
Arama Sonuçları
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Yayın Turkiye and the future of normalization in the Middle East(SETA, 2022) Duran, Burhanettin; Duran, Burhanettin; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüFollowing the Arab Spring, all the nations in the Middle East started to pursue a phase of regional softness after a protracted era of strife and rivalry. in many areas of the Middle East, the normalization agenda is being implemented in a coordinated manner based on specific concerns. For a number of reasons, Turkiye has emerged as both a participant in the brand-new normalization process in the Middle East and as a nation making an effort to regulate it. This research article attempts to elaborate on the dynamics of the normalization process ushered in by the Arab Spring and Turkiyes role in spearheading this process with projected outcomes aimed at long term stability in the region. Overall, the pursuit of normalization is encouraging but not without flaws due to the persistence of ideological differences and conflicts of interest among regional actors and between major international powers.Yayın The codes of the Ak Party’s ideological transformation(SETA, 2020) Duran, Burhanettin; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüThe identity and ideology of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party), and more importantly, the transformation thereof, which came to power just one year after its establishment and has ruled Turkey for 18 consecutive years, has been the subject of heated debate. At home and abroad, there is an ongoing discussion about where the AK Party ‘wants to take Turkey.’ In this regard, a number of ideologically- charged criticisms have been voiced over the years. The most extreme lines of criticism include the accusation that the movement was a sub-contractor of Washington’s Greater Middle East Project and the charge of turning Turkey’s back on the West to join the Eurasian axis. It is important to note that the same critics identify the AK Party in various ways, ranging from ‘democratic Islamist’ to ‘religious authoritarian’ to ‘counter-revolutionary’ and ‘religious Kemalist’. In the wake of the 2009 World Economic Summit in Davos, Switzerland and the 2010 Mavi Marmara incident, the AK Party was charged with ‘returning to Islamism’ and ‘taking an authoritarian turn’. Since the 2013 Gezi Park protests, that narrative became commonplace in the Western media. Amidst those accusations, how the AK Party views its actions vis-à-vis its political platform and identity references is often ignored...Yayın Turkey's constitutional referendum and its effects on Turkish politics(Deutsches Orient-Institut, 2017) Duran, Burhanettin; Miş, Nebi; Duran, Burhanettin; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler BölümüThis contribution analyses the presidential system of government and its impacts on Turkish politics. First of all, this work elaborates the reasons of those who support a change of the current political system, addressing the current parliamentary system's crises from a historical perspective. Subsequently, it explains why the system change was possible during the AKP era, even though different political parties have made efforts regarding this issue in the past. In this section, it refers to those crises that emerged within the system particularly during the AKP era. Furthermore, it addresses the crises' facilitating role with regard to the people's acceptance of the system change. In the third section, reasons for the AKP-MHP agreement, which was reached subsequent to the 15 July coup attempt, are addressed. The fourth part focuses on the presidential system of the government's constitutional framework. In the final part, the transition period to the new system of government and the system's impacts on Turkish politics are elaborated.
