Yazar "Taiai, Maria" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
  • Küçük Resim
    Yayın
    Comparative theories and methods between uniplexity and multiplexity
    (İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2020) Şentürk, Recep; Açıkgenç, Alparslan; Küçükural, Önder; Yamamoto, Qayyim Naoki; Keskin Aksay, Nursem; Özalkan, Seda; Asadov, Ayaz; Naeem, Danish; Belkız, Evren; Faytre, Leonard; Taiai, Maria; Noorata, Metin; Kırkarlar, Osman; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Sosyoloji Bölümü
    This work is intended to be a textbook for the fundamentals of theoriesand methods in the social sciences and the humanities. Along with theknowledge of the existing theories and methods, this book will provide theanalytical tools that will help the reader comprehend the hidden assumptionsand philosophical underpinnings from a comparative and critical perspective.More precisely, this book aims to introduce not only theories and methods butalso the worldviews from which they emerge and the paradigms that they arerooted in. Crystallizing the ontological, epistemological and methodologicalcategories in mind, this book will also help the reader be consistent in researchquestions, methods and conclusions...
  • Küçük Resim
    Yayın
    Silence acts: Pragmatics of silence in communication
    (İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitüsü, 2022) Taiai, Maria; Şentürk, Recep; Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitüsü, Medeniyet Araştırmaları Ana Bilim Dalı
    Silence, like speech, is an act. Even though silence is more ambiguous than speech, its contextual effects enable it to carry an illocutionary force, as much as speech does. Silence that carries an illocutionary force is referred to as eloquent silence and is often equivalent to speech acts. This study attempted to build on the existing literature by investigating pragmatics of silence in a tradition where it plays an important role in communication, namely Islam. It is firmly based on an examination of the relevant texts in two sources which are the basis for the Muslim way of life: the Qur’?n and the Sunnah. To investigate pragmatics of silence in communication in the selected texts, we first identified the main elements of communication, namely speaker (S), message, addressee (A), and response. Second, we tried to answer the following questions: 1)What did S or A do with silence? and 2) Why did S or A remain silent? The answer to the first question helped us understand functions of silence and the answer to the second question helped us identify its motives. Each chapter ends with a discussion of pragmatics of silence in light of communication theory in general, and speech act theory, in particular. We concluded from our analysis that silence is not only equivalent to a performative but may, in some communication settings, be equivalent to a transformative act. We referred to silence that has a performative effect as performative silence and to silence that has a transformative effect as transformative silence.
  • Yayın
    Uses, motives, functions, and virtues of silence in argumentation in light of Jadal and Adab al-Bahth wa al-Munazarah
    (University of Malaya, 2021) Oruç, Rahmi; Oruç, Rahmi; Taiai, Maria; Oruç, Rahmi; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Bölümü; İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat Bölümü
    Munazarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his turn comes. In fact, proper argumentation requires each party to remain silent where the right to speak is not theirs. However, the argumentation process in practice does not always follow the ideal rules of behaviour. One such instance is verbal aggressiveness, which often leads to anger and rapid information exchange with the offender. Such verbal exchange is generally characterized by an increase in volume and speed of speech, which usually lay the ground for a quarrel. The transition from healthy argumentation to quarrel is problematic because it changes the priorities of the parties involved in the verbal exchange from disclosing the truth to attacking the opponent. Then, the arguers are faced with the following question: What should I do when argumentation seems to be shifting to quarrel? Should I speak, or should I remain silent? The study argues the use of silence as an argumentation strategy prevents healthy argumentation from turning into a quarrel and enables discussants to conduct an ideal argumentation based on ethical standards. It does this in light of the disciplines of Jadal and Adab al-Bahth wa al-Munazarah. The study first explains how muna.arah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent. Second, it discusses three argumentative moves in response to which silence might work better as an argumentative strategy. After that, it explores the intricate relationship between silence and tawfiq (divine aid). Finally, it investigates the relationship between silence - as a response to verbal aggressiveness - and the virtue of hilm (judiciousness).