Yazar "Saeedi, Nilab" seçeneğine göre listele
Listeleniyor 1 - 3 / 3
Sayfa Başına Sonuç
Sıralama seçenekleri
Yayın Ahdi`s Gülşen-î Şuarâ an unusual example of biographical dictionary of poets(Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi, 2020) Saeedi, NilabŞair Tezkires are an important source of information. For history-writing and literature, biographies have played an important role. Important for XVI Century Ahdi’s Gülşen-i Şuara written in 1564 is the fourth Şair Tezkire example in Ottoman Turkish. Among many Şair Tezkires in Ottoman literature, Ahdi`s work is different than others. This work is an important source of information for poets around Baghdad. The Biographical Dictionary of Poets provided in Gülşeni Şuara is hard to find anywhere else. Another important point which makes Gülşen-i Şuaraa worthy text is Ahdi himself. Being from Baghdad he showcases an Arabic perspective inside his text in Ottoman Turkish. A very strong argument comes out of reading Ahdi, is an outsider perspective of the Ottoman. Ahdi comes out of the text as a devoted personality. He makes sure to mention all the religious information inside the text. While no classification is given inside the text but a non-stated classification comes out as the text continues. Ahdi before moving to poets, tries to introduce poets in different classes of the Ottoman empire.Yayın In the shadow of Tīmūr: Revisitng the battle of Ankara with Muṣlıḥ Al-Dīn Al-Lārī(Ahmet Şimşek, 2024) Saeedi, NilabThe Battle of Ankara in 1402 between Tīmūr and Sulṭān Yıldırım Bāyezīd I occupy an important place in the history of the Ottoman Empire and marks the beginning of the Ottoman Interregnum or Fetret Devri. The decentralization and subsequent collapse of the centralized Ottoman state is largely attributed to this battle. This paper examines the narrative of the Battle of Ankara by the sixteenth-century scholar Muṣliḥ al-Dīn al-Lārī, a Safavid immigrant who settled in the Ottoman Empire. A unique perspective on the battle is provided by Lārī's universal history, Mir'atü'l-advār ve Mirkātü'l-Ahbār, which he presented to the Ottoman Sulṭān Selīm II on his enthronement. This paper argues that despite the work being dedicated to an Ottoman sultan, Lārī's account legitimizes Tīmūr and his campaign against the Ottomans by presenting Tīmūr's actions in a favorable light.Yayın Similar narration of the Other: Lârî’s narration of the Battle of Çaldıran under Ottoman’s influence (1514)(Yunus Kaplan, 2024) Saeedi, NilabThe Battle of Çaldıran in 1514, which took place between the Ottoman Empire under Sulṭān Selīm (d. 926/1520) and the Safavid Empire under Shāh Ismāʿīl (d. 930/1524), is a key historical moment. Its interpretation, however, differs markedly between Ottoman and Safavid historical accounts. Ottoman narratives herald it as a resounding triumph, while Safavid accounts portray it as Sulṭān Selīm’s failed attempt to completely subjugate their empire. This study examines the instrumental role of Lārī, a Safavid expatriate living in the Ottoman Empire, in the production of his historical treatise ‘Mir’atü’l-advār ve Mirkātü’lAhbār’. It argues that Lārī, animated by loyalty to the Ottoman perspective and antipathy towards the Safavids, deliberately endorsed the Ottoman version, despite his intimate acquaintance with Safavid sources. His chronicles portray the Safavids as deviating from Islamic principles, thereby sanctioning Sulṭān Selīm’s military incursion. This study emphasizes that the sixteenth-century rivalry between the Ottomans and the Safavids gave rise to different paradigms of behavior, shaped by different ambitions such as the pursuit of material gain, social status and prestige. In this context, Lārī serves as a prominent case in point.
