İbn Haldun Üniversitesi Kurumsal Akademik Arşivi

DSpace@İHÜ, İbn Haldun Üniversitesi tarafından doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak yayınlanan; kitap, makale, tez, bildiri, rapor, araştırma verisi gibi tüm akademik kaynakları uluslararası standartlarda dijital ortamda depolar, Üniversitenin akademik performansını izlemeye aracılık eder, kaynakları uzun süreli saklar ve yayınların etkisini artırmak için telif haklarına uygun olarak Açık Erişime sunar.

 

Güncel Gönderiler

Yayın
Predictive role of irrational beliefs and self-efficacy in romantic relationship on perceived relationship quality
(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, 2023) Aydın, Meryem Beyza; Doğru, Naime; Doğru, Naime
It aims to examine irrational beliefs and self-efficacy in romantic relationships among university students. The participants of the study consisted of 361 university students from various private and public universities, mainly from Istanbul Medeniyet University and Istanbul Medipol University. In the study, Perceived Relationship Quality Questionnaire, Irrational Beliefs in Romantic Relationship Questionnaire, Self-Efficacy in Romantic Relationship Questionnaire, and Socio-Demographic Information Form were used to collect the data from university students. In order to examine the predictive power of irrational beliefs and self-efficacy in romantic relationships and their subdimensions in predicting perceived relationship quality in university students, correlation analyses were conducted, followed by multiple linear regression analysis in SPSS version 23.0. Moreover, independent sample t-test analysis and ANOVA tests were conducted to determine the perceived relationship quality, irrational beliefs, and self-efficacy in romantic relationships; both total scores and subdimensions scores of university students differed significantly in terms of gender and relationship durations. The findings gained from the analyses revealed that perceived relationship quality was significantly predicted by irrational beliefs and selfefficacy. Irrational beliefs and self-efficacy in romantic relationships explained 18% of the variance of perceived relationship quality. Also, “use of social time” in subdimensions of irrational beliefs and negative self-efficacy and positive self-efficacy were significant predictors of perceived relationship quality. Moreover, it was found there is no significant difference in perceived relationship quality between male and female participants.
Yayın
Beyond the empirical and ethical divide: İbn Khaldun's multiplex philosophy of politics and education
(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitüsü, 2023) Özalkan, Seda; Şentürk, Recep
Why is there a tension between the empirical and the ethical approaches in political and educational theory? This tension is often traced back to David Hume’s demarcation between “is” and “ought” claims. This distinction was further solidified by the principles of logical positivism, which made a clear separation between facts and values, thereby further distancing empirical from normative modes of inquiry. This philosophical stance has contributed to an indecision in the field of political theory over the last century, oscillating between empirical-positive and ethicalnormative approaches, or in other words, descriptive and prescriptive perspectives, as scholars have struggled to balance these two frameworks. There was a division of labor: empirical political theorists focused on the empirical “is” of politics, while normative political theorists concerned themselves with the ethical “ought” of politics. Empirical approaches to political theory are concerned with discovering the causal laws that explain why society is the way it is. Normative approach to political theory, on the other hand, is concerned with ethical considerations, values, and prescriptions about how societies ought to be organized and governed…
Yayın
The new warring states era: Reviving of Legalism in China
(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitüsü, 2023) Tanrıkut, Mevlan; Ringmar, Erik Ivar; Ringmar, Erik
Given China's rapid development and its emergence as a major competitor to the West, it has become increasingly important for researchers to comprehend China comprehensively, encompassing its philosophy, culture, history, and politics. However, it has become commonplace for many academics and politicians to approach their understanding of China primarily through the lens of Confucian philosophy (Lin Yutang: 1934) and predict China's future development trajectory through a progressive perspective. Numerous studies claimed that China would become democratic with its economic prosperity. Yet, with China's growing economic strength and Xi Jinping's ascent to power, China has openly rejected the adoption of Western values and instead posited that it possesses alternative values and systems. Despite China being second in GDP and first in the middle-class number, it is still not democratic and Xi Jinping’s autocratic style is at odds with the benevolent ruling method advocated by Confucius. It seems that academic stereotypes that apply historically progressive approaches in China studies and put Confucianism at the center of Chinese political culture need to be revised. To this end, this research tries to answer two specific questions which are why the historical approach is more appropriate for China study and what kind of governing style China trying to implement under the leadership of Xi Jinping. By examining the influence of the Legalist school of thought on the Chinese administrative culture, this study asserts that rather than the modernization approach, the historical approach needs to apply to China studies methodologically and China’s political culture should not always be studied from the Confucian perspective, but the Legalist school of thought also seriously takes into account. Without Legalism, we can only partially understand China’s governance philosophy. As to the second question, this paper claims that present-day China is on the way to reviving the Han Dynasty style governing method under the leadership of Xi Jinping with the national project of “revitalizing the excellent Chinese culture”.
Yayın
İmparatorluğun sonunda müze ve İslam sanatı
(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Medeniyetler İttifakı Enstitüsü, 2023) Çakırca, Emine Betül; Cooke, Miriam
Bu tez çalışmasında 19. yüzyıl ikinci yarısından 20. yüzyıl ilk çeyreğine uzanan süreçte Osmanlı Müzeciliği ve İslam sanatı koleksiyonlarının oluştuğu süreç ele alınmıştır. İslam sanatının kavramsallaşmasında ve siyasi bir imge haline gelmesinde Osmanlı müzeciliğinin ve eski eser koruma politikalarının rolü değerlendirilmiştir. Tezin tarihsel bağlamı bu dönemde öne çıkan imparatorluklar arası iktidar ve meşruiyet rekabetidir…
Yayın
Where does morality come from? How can psychology help answer the question: Is morality innate?
(İbn Haldun Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, 2022) Gaaloul, Nadia; Doko, Enis; Doko, Enis
In this research, I attempt to do two things. I will first answer whether morality is innate or acquired through philosophy and psychology. Second, I will uncover which philosophical, ethical theory is the most realistically accurate. Aristotle maintains that morality comes from a virtuous character that can be attained through practical wisdom and habituation. He believes that morality is acquired. Kant claims that morality is derived from categorical imperatives that are based on reason. He has the view that we cannot trust our innate impulses because they will lead us to radical evil. Mill also believes that morality comes from reason, yet he sees that this reason is based on the principle of utility, which judges a moral action based on the amount of pleasure and goodness it produces. Regarding Psychologists, there are two arguments. Thinkers that believe that morality is acquired argue that it is culturally conditioned and, like Kant and Mill, believe that we cannot trust our innate feelings and instincts as they will lead us astray. Part of those innate feelings is empathy, which cannot be trusted to guide our morality. Those that believe morality is innate see that it is a product of evolution and that it is partially innate, that we have innate mechanisms, that include empathy, that motivate us to act morally and learn moral laws and rules from our culture. Even though morality is partially innate, we are still responsible for creating moral habits since our cognitive structures are limited and will cause us mental fatigue if we have to think about and attend to every moral cue. Most empirical findings point to Aristotle's theory being the closest. He was right in what he claimed, except for the idea that morality is fully acquired.