Alternatives to the state: Or, why a non-western IR must be a revolutionary science

Ringmar, Erik Ivarİnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü2020-07-252020-07-252020Ri·ngmar, E. (2020). Alternatives to the state: Or, why a non-western IR must be a revolutionary science. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 9 (2), 149-162.2146-7757https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TkRJd05ESTVPUT09https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.747068https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12154/1184The idea of the sovereign state is at the core of the Western understanding of international politics. If we are serious about coming up with non-Western theories of international politics, it is the state that must be questioned. This article suggests some ways in which this can be done. Only once we have unthought the state can we reconstruct international politics as a more equitable, and peaceful, world order.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNon-Western IR TheoryThe StateEmpiresPan-AfricanismOttoman EmpireAlternatives to the state: Or, why a non-western IR must be a revolutionary scienceArticle9214916210.20991/allazimuth.747068Q3WOS:0005485325000012-s2.0-85087819069TkRJd05ESTVPUT09Q3