Yeşilırmak, AliYeşilırmak, AliBrekoulakis, StavrosWeeramantry, RomeshNagapetyan, LilitHukuk Fakültesi, Hukuk Bölümü2023-06-052023-06-052023Yeşilırmak, A. (2023). Transparency and stakeholders’ role in the selection of the arbitral tribunal. S. Brekoulakis, R. Weeramantry, L. Nagapetyan (Ed.), Achieving the Arbitration Dream: Liber Amicorum for Professor Julian D.M. Lew KC içinde (285-293 ss.). Wolters Kluwer.9.7894E+12https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12154/2266International arbitration has been ever evolving since the introduction of modernized arbitration rules in the last century.1 The evolution is very mııch related to the satisfaction of users and other stakeholders of arbitration. One of the evolving areas is transparency. The issue of transparency mainly derived from investment arbitration2 for the protection of public interests, but has been adopted to cover wider interests, needs and dynamics in international commercial arbitration. Transparency touches upon many aspects of international commercial arbitration; selection/appointment of arbitrators, the arbitration process, orders and awards ete. Perhaps one of the most important of ali is the selection/appointment of arbitrators. This is because ‘arbitration is only as good as its arbitrators.’3 The selection/appointment of arbitrators generally has a direct effect on the quality of arbitration. The users of arbitration desires to have predietable and just decisionmaking. Thus, transparency is directly related to independence and impartiality of arbitrators, due process and accountability…eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTransparencyArbitrationArbitratorRoleBook Chapter285293